<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Answer to Global Warming: The Genesis Flood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Correction - it is called &quot;Global Warming, Global Flood&quot;. The website is www.prophezeiung.net. Sorry, I am in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction &#8211; it is called &#8220;Global Warming, Global Flood&#8221;. The website is <a href="http://www.prophezeiung.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.prophezeiung.net</a>. Sorry, I am in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I wrote a book exactly about that. It is caused Global Warming, Global Flood. A free version with about 60 pages of this book is available. Please visit my website www.prophzeiung.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a book exactly about that. It is caused Global Warming, Global Flood. A free version with about 60 pages of this book is available. Please visit my website <a href="http://www.prophzeiung.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.prophzeiung.net</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James DiPasquale</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>James DiPasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-23</guid>
		<description>For a definitive treatment of the question as to whether man has impacted the climate I challenge you to watch this video and then come back and post a comment:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4860344067427439443&amp;ei=7Aj1Sb_oA5GErQKgxaQQ&amp;q=global+warming+or+global+governance&amp;hl=en
 
Politicians are using bad science to generate fear in the masses of people about a supposed “Global Warming Crises” very reminiscent of Chicken Little crying “The sky is falling!” Quite remarkably, their “Global” solution fits in well with what the Bible says will be the condition of world government in the end times. Here is an interesting observation. Consider the following from Revelation 6:8:

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.” KJV
 
That word “pale” used here is actually the Greek word for green. Could it be that the new political movement of “Green” will be used by Satan to formulate his global government?
 
Food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a definitive treatment of the question as to whether man has impacted the climate I challenge you to watch this video and then come back and post a comment:<br />
<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4860344067427439443&amp;ei=7Aj1Sb_oA5GErQKgxaQQ&amp;q=global+warming+or+global+governance&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4860344067427439443&amp;ei=7Aj1Sb_oA5GErQKgxaQQ&amp;q=global+warming+or+global+governance&amp;hl=en</a></p>
<p>Politicians are using bad science to generate fear in the masses of people about a supposed “Global Warming Crises” very reminiscent of Chicken Little crying “The sky is falling!” Quite remarkably, their “Global” solution fits in well with what the Bible says will be the condition of world government in the end times. Here is an interesting observation. Consider the following from Revelation 6:8:</p>
<p>“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.” KJV</p>
<p>That word “pale” used here is actually the Greek word for green. Could it be that the new political movement of “Green” will be used by Satan to formulate his global government?</p>
<p>Food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Schanberg</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Schanberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Global warming is taking place today, but what is the cause? Is it man&#039;s activities as some claim or the result of natural processes? If you consider the period of global warming from 950AD to about 1350AD, which is before the industrial age, it becomes apparent that global warming is cause by natural events and not man produced green house gases. How do evolutionary geologists account for this period of global warming, or the period of global cooling during the Little Ice Age of 1450AD to 1850AD for that matter? 

In my opinion, man&#039;s contribution to global warming is insignificant compared to Nature&#039;s. For those readers who believe otherwise, I would like to add the following observation. A fact overlooked by some &quot;experts&quot; is that the destruction of tropical rain forest in South America and Africa adds significantly to the accumulation of green house gases by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed during photosynthesis.  Even if we reduce our carbon foot print, it will not help if we continue to destroy  earth&#039;s tropical rain forests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is taking place today, but what is the cause? Is it man&#8217;s activities as some claim or the result of natural processes? If you consider the period of global warming from 950AD to about 1350AD, which is before the industrial age, it becomes apparent that global warming is cause by natural events and not man produced green house gases. How do evolutionary geologists account for this period of global warming, or the period of global cooling during the Little Ice Age of 1450AD to 1850AD for that matter? </p>
<p>In my opinion, man&#8217;s contribution to global warming is insignificant compared to Nature&#8217;s. For those readers who believe otherwise, I would like to add the following observation. A fact overlooked by some &#8220;experts&#8221; is that the destruction of tropical rain forest in South America and Africa adds significantly to the accumulation of green house gases by reducing the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed during photosynthesis.  Even if we reduce our carbon foot print, it will not help if we continue to destroy  earth&#8217;s tropical rain forests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rowitt</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rowitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-8</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to hear statements from the mouths the indoctrinated, e.g. molecules to men is a fact and all else is pseudoscience. Why people will swallow such philosophical nonsense can only be traced back to the fact that science education today is nothing more than a fairytale for grown-ups that uses very scientific sounding titles for clearly unscientific hypotheses, e.g. the Hopeful Monster Theory is tweaked and repackaged as Punctuated Equilibrium and the ever popular and continuously debunked theory of Spontaneous Generation is renamed Abiogenesis.

In any case, frogs do not turn into princes overnight and neither do single-celled organisms turn into every other form of life on planet earth in millions or even billions of years. Time is not the magic ingredient of evolutionary theory any more than natural selection can ever increase the genetic information of any living organism to the point of producing the generational changes that can change an organism from a lower or simpler state to a higher, more complex state.

While I would gratefully accept a comparison of models, the overarching philosophy of naturalism by its foundational worldview excludes any other competing model. I remind those who so easily embrace the evolutionary worldview that it is based, not on the scientific method, but rather on the censorship of any scientific criticism of Darwinian Theory, exclusion of any line of reasoning that questions Darwinian evolution, e.g. Intelligent Design or outright deception, e.g. fanciful reconstructions of fossils that either do not even exist or presentations of findings that have been manipulated to look authentic when they are clearly not.

If anyone would like to examine all the evidence and discard the “don’t confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up” point of view, I refer you to a very well written and flawlessly documented text Evolution: The Grand Experiment by Dr. Werner Gitt that can be found on the CSI website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to hear statements from the mouths the indoctrinated, e.g. molecules to men is a fact and all else is pseudoscience. Why people will swallow such philosophical nonsense can only be traced back to the fact that science education today is nothing more than a fairytale for grown-ups that uses very scientific sounding titles for clearly unscientific hypotheses, e.g. the Hopeful Monster Theory is tweaked and repackaged as Punctuated Equilibrium and the ever popular and continuously debunked theory of Spontaneous Generation is renamed Abiogenesis.</p>
<p>In any case, frogs do not turn into princes overnight and neither do single-celled organisms turn into every other form of life on planet earth in millions or even billions of years. Time is not the magic ingredient of evolutionary theory any more than natural selection can ever increase the genetic information of any living organism to the point of producing the generational changes that can change an organism from a lower or simpler state to a higher, more complex state.</p>
<p>While I would gratefully accept a comparison of models, the overarching philosophy of naturalism by its foundational worldview excludes any other competing model. I remind those who so easily embrace the evolutionary worldview that it is based, not on the scientific method, but rather on the censorship of any scientific criticism of Darwinian Theory, exclusion of any line of reasoning that questions Darwinian evolution, e.g. Intelligent Design or outright deception, e.g. fanciful reconstructions of fossils that either do not even exist or presentations of findings that have been manipulated to look authentic when they are clearly not.</p>
<p>If anyone would like to examine all the evidence and discard the “don’t confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up” point of view, I refer you to a very well written and flawlessly documented text Evolution: The Grand Experiment by Dr. Werner Gitt that can be found on the CSI website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gct</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>gct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I’m not exactly qualified to pass judgment on the above theory, however, for what its worth, it makes sense to me.  Either way, Nienhuis’ Ice Age Civilizations was fascinating.  I’d recommend it to anyone.  I’ve heard of a few underwater cities before, but never knew there were so many, all apparently submerging at the same time of around 1500bc. 

Response to D. Hills comment:
	You need to chill out a bit.  Relax - Unwind - Breath deeply - Roll your eyeballs around - Life isn’t always about you.  Go take a pill.  Here’s a little reading material while you swallow:

A few quotes from intelligent, rational scientists (I can get lots more):

&quot;&#039;Science positively demands creation.&#039; &quot; Lord Kelvin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation, (1988), p. 94.

&quot;The particular truth is simply that we have no reliable evidence as to the evolutionary sequence . . One can find qualified, professional arguments for any group being the descendant of almost any other. &quot;*J. Bonner, &quot;Book Review,&quot; American Scientist 49:1961, p. 240.

&quot;What good is half a jaw or half a wing? . . These tales, in the &#039;Just-So Stories&#039; tradition of evolutionary natural history, do not prove anything . . concepts salvaged only by facile speculation do not appeal much to me.&quot; *Stephen Jay Gould, &quot;The Return of Hopeful Monsters,&quot; Natural History, June/July, 1977

&quot;Present-day ultra-Darwinism, which is so sure of itself, impresses incompletely informed biologists, misleads them, and inspires fallacious interpretations . .
&quot;Through use and abuse of hidden postulates, of bolo, often ill-founded extrapolations, a pseudo-science has been seated. It is taking root in the very heart of biology and is leading astray many biochemists and biologists, who sincerely believe that the accuracy of fundamental concepts has been demonstrated, which is not the case.&quot; *Pierre P. Grease, The Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 202.

&quot;Evolution is baseless and quite incredible.&quot; *Ambrose Flemming, president, British Association for Advancement of Science, in The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought.

&quot;I personally hold the evolutionary position, but yet lament the fact that the majority of our Ph.D. graduates are frightfully ignorant of many of the serious problems of the evolution theory. These problems will not be solved unless we bring them to the attention of students. Most students assume evolution is proved, the missing link is found, and all we have left is a few rough edges to smooth out. Actually, quite the contrary is true; and many recent discoveries . . have forced us to re-evaluate our basic assumptions.&quot; *Director of a large graduate biology department, quoted in Creation: The Cutting Edge (1982), p. 28.

&quot;Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century.&quot; *Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985), p. 358.

&quot;We still do not know the mechanics of evolution in spite of the over-confident claims in some quarters, nor are we likely to make further progress in this by the classical methods of paleontology or biology.&quot; *Errol White, Proceedings of the Lannean Society, London 177:8 (1988).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not exactly qualified to pass judgment on the above theory, however, for what its worth, it makes sense to me.  Either way, Nienhuis’ Ice Age Civilizations was fascinating.  I’d recommend it to anyone.  I’ve heard of a few underwater cities before, but never knew there were so many, all apparently submerging at the same time of around 1500bc. </p>
<p>Response to D. Hills comment:<br />
	You need to chill out a bit.  Relax &#8211; Unwind &#8211; Breath deeply &#8211; Roll your eyeballs around &#8211; Life isn’t always about you.  Go take a pill.  Here’s a little reading material while you swallow:</p>
<p>A few quotes from intelligent, rational scientists (I can get lots more):</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Science positively demands creation.&#8217; &#8221; Lord Kelvin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation, (1988), p. 94.</p>
<p>&#8220;The particular truth is simply that we have no reliable evidence as to the evolutionary sequence . . One can find qualified, professional arguments for any group being the descendant of almost any other. &#8220;*J. Bonner, &#8220;Book Review,&#8221; American Scientist 49:1961, p. 240.</p>
<p>&#8220;What good is half a jaw or half a wing? . . These tales, in the &#8216;Just-So Stories&#8217; tradition of evolutionary natural history, do not prove anything . . concepts salvaged only by facile speculation do not appeal much to me.&#8221; *Stephen Jay Gould, &#8220;The Return of Hopeful Monsters,&#8221; Natural History, June/July, 1977</p>
<p>&#8220;Present-day ultra-Darwinism, which is so sure of itself, impresses incompletely informed biologists, misleads them, and inspires fallacious interpretations . .<br />
&#8220;Through use and abuse of hidden postulates, of bolo, often ill-founded extrapolations, a pseudo-science has been seated. It is taking root in the very heart of biology and is leading astray many biochemists and biologists, who sincerely believe that the accuracy of fundamental concepts has been demonstrated, which is not the case.&#8221; *Pierre P. Grease, The Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 202.</p>
<p>&#8220;Evolution is baseless and quite incredible.&#8221; *Ambrose Flemming, president, British Association for Advancement of Science, in The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought.</p>
<p>&#8220;I personally hold the evolutionary position, but yet lament the fact that the majority of our Ph.D. graduates are frightfully ignorant of many of the serious problems of the evolution theory. These problems will not be solved unless we bring them to the attention of students. Most students assume evolution is proved, the missing link is found, and all we have left is a few rough edges to smooth out. Actually, quite the contrary is true; and many recent discoveries . . have forced us to re-evaluate our basic assumptions.&#8221; *Director of a large graduate biology department, quoted in Creation: The Cutting Edge (1982), p. 28.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century.&#8221; *Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985), p. 358.</p>
<p>&#8220;We still do not know the mechanics of evolution in spite of the over-confident claims in some quarters, nor are we likely to make further progress in this by the classical methods of paleontology or biology.&#8221; *Errol White, Proceedings of the Lannean Society, London 177:8 (1988).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d hill</title>
		<link>http://creation101.wordpress.com/the-answer-to-global-warming-the-genesis-flood/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>d hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creation101.wordpress.com/?page_id=11#comment-6</guid>
		<description>There is no science at all, pseudo or real, in this nonsense. It is such a shame that otherwise intelligent rational people persist in these facile utterly ridiculous beliefs despite the overwhelming evidence for evolution which is no longer a theory but proven fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no science at all, pseudo or real, in this nonsense. It is such a shame that otherwise intelligent rational people persist in these facile utterly ridiculous beliefs despite the overwhelming evidence for evolution which is no longer a theory but proven fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
